CLEBUS WHITE PAPER
  • 1. Abstract
  • 2. Motivation
    • 2.1 Intense Resource Allocation in Marketing
    • 2.2 Existing Monetization Systems and Unclear Business Models
    • 2.3 Failure to Sustainably Regulate Inflation
    • 2.4 Issues with Artistic Quality
    • 2.5 Legal Regulation Issues
  • 3. Role of CLEBUS
  • 4. CLEBUS TEAM'S Mission
  • 5. Benefits of CLEBUS
    • 5.1 Users
    • 5.2 Metaverse Developers and Partner Companies
    • 5.3 Creators
    • 5.4 Advertisers
  • 6. Utility of blockchain
    • 6.1 Compensation based on contribution
    • 6.2 Prevention of Abuse and Manipulation
    • 6.3 Addressing Marketing Challenges for Initial Market Entry
  • 7. CLEBUS Features
    • 7.1 User Data Sovereignty
    • 7.2 Community Rewards
    • 7.3 Technical Support for Metaverse Developers and NFT Issuers
  • 8. CLEBUS Platform
    • 8.1 CLE WALLET
    • 8.2 Clebus-X
    • 8.3 CLEBUS M
  • 9. CLEBUS Network Layer
  • 10. CLE Token
    • 10.1 Distribution
  • 11. ROADMAP
  • 12. TEAM
  • 13. Legal Notice
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. 2. Motivation

2.4 Issues with Artistic Quality

Existing metaverse platforms face fundamental issues with artistic quality. Many metaverses have either lost user interest and shut down, or they lack basic artistic quality and quality control. Some platforms buy and apply blockchain technology to previously abandoned IPs, while others have platforms that provide no benefits compared to general community platforms.

Previous2.3 Failure to Sustainably Regulate InflationNext2.5 Legal Regulation Issues

Last updated 1 year ago